[ Список тем | Создать тему ]
[ 0‒9 ]
| Misha | Отщепенцы | [Ответить] |
| 23 ноября, 15:38
Наблюдатели ПАСЕ: Голосование состоялось Голосование состоялось. Несмотря на негативные стороны кампании, наблюдатели ПАСЕ пришли к решению, что голосование было хорошо организованно и прошло в спокойной обстановке. Об этом на пресс-конференции сообщил глава временного комитета Парламентской Ассамблеи Совета Европы Дороса Кристодулидуса. В тексте заявления ПАСЕ, которым располагает ForUm, в частности говорится: «Члены избирательных комиссий работали согласно процедуре, установленной действующим законодательством. Не смотря на напряжение в предвыборный период, и на то, что были нарушены некоторые основные свободы, мы уверены, что электорат не потерял веру в демократический процесс. Главное сейчас убедиться, что эта вера не была напрасной, и что общество, и оба кандидата могли быть уверенны в процессе подсчета голосов и в окончательных результатах выборов. Таким образом делегация ПАСЕ рекомендует: передать результаты выборов общественным наблюдателям на всех уровнях, а также опубликовать анализ выводов избирательных участков, сразу после объявления официальных результатов». Ким того, по мнению главы временного комитета ПАСЕТ, соответствующие органы власти должны обеспечить своевременное и прозрачное рассмотрение всех жалоб в полном соответствии с существующим избирательным законодательством и Конституцией Украины. По мнению наблюдателей, любое зафиксированное нарушение должно расследоваться, и если оно подтверждено, преступление должно рассматриваться в судебном порядке. http://for-ua.com/news/2004/11/23/153800.html | ||
| Vyacheslav | Угу. Сайтодержатели. | [Ответить] |
| А вот что біло в оригинале
http://press.coe.int/cp/2004/585a(2004).htm Second round of Ukrainian election failed to address election irregularities and lacked transparency KYIV, 22 November 2004 - The second round of the presidential election in Ukraine on 21 November did not meet a considerable number of OSCE commitments, Council of Europe and other European standards for democratic elections. As in the first round, state executive authorities and the Central Election Commission displayed a lack of will to conduct a genuine democratic election process, concluded the International Election Observation Mission in a preliminary statement released today. Between the two rounds, the Mission reported cases of public sector employees and students being pressured to support the current Prime Minister, Mr. Viktor Yanukovyich. Nevertheless, a vibrant civil society demonstrated once again a high level of interest and engagement. Despite serious shortcomings in the process the second round of the election offered voters a choice, although campaign conditions were not equal. “With a even heavier heart than three weeks ago, I have to repeat the message from the first round; this election did not meet a considerable number of international standards for democratic elections,” said Mr. Bruce George, President emeritus of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and the Special Co-ordinator for the short-term observers. “The deficiencies have not been addressed. The abuse of state resources in favor of the Prime Minister continued as well as an overwhelming media bias in his favor.” The Head of the delegation from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Mr. Doros Christodoulides, said: “There were some encouraging aspects which we did not see in the first round, such as a televised debate of the main candidates on state TV and redress, even if only partial, to the imbalanced media coverage. But we are greatly disappointed by the inflammatory campaign language, which increased prior to the second round.” Mr. Marek Maciej Siwiec, Head of the European Parliament delegation added: “The opportunity to improve the electoral process between the two rounds was not used. However, some improvement on media coverage was noticed. It is encouraging that the people of this country did once again express great interest in the election, manifesting a strong democratic spirit. Our delegation will now report back to the parliament with suggested recommendations.” “The figures and reports about the unjustified increase in the use of absentee voter certificates and the even higher increase of mobile voting, cast a shadow over the genuineness of the results. Moreover the turnout in some territorial election commissions in Donetsk, exceeding 98,5%, and increasing by 21% after the first round, are unrealistic and highly suspicious,” said Mr. Lucio Malan, Head of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly delegation. Ambassador Geert-Hinrich Ahrens, Head of the OSCE/ODIHR’s long-term observation mission, stressed that the electoral process was not concluded and urged transparency, especially in the tabulation on the votes. “While this was certainly a competitive election, it was not conducted on a level playing field. However, there is still time for the authorities to take every measure to reassure voters that the results were accurately processed.” On election day, voting was conducted in a generally calm manner. However observers assessed election day less favourably than in the first round, particularly in the central and eastern regions. Observers noted more serious violations, including some isolated incidents of violence, and a pattern of intimidation, including directed towards observers, polling commission members and individual voters. In a significant number of polling stations, commission members had been dismissed. In some instances, unauthorized persons were interfering in or directing the process, or otherwise attempting to influence voters. The observers’ assessment of the ballot counting process was worse than on 31 October, including poorer overall organisation, and more questions raised about the accuracy of results reported. Problems included lack of sufficient attention to ballot security and counting procedures. In almost 40% of polling stations unauthorized persons were present including police and local government officials. The IEOM included 563 observers from the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR), the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the European Parliament, and the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. A final report will be released approximately six weeks after the completion of the electoral process. | ||
| Misha | Re: Угу. Сайтодержатели. | [Ответить] |
| Речь не о ОБСЕ, а о ПАСЕ (!) | ||
| Сергей Федосов | Re: Угу. Сайтодержатели. | [Ответить] |
| Что такое ПАСЕ? | ||
| Misha | Re: Угу. Сайтодержатели. | [Ответить] |
| ПАрламентская Ассамблея Совета Европы. | ||
| Vyacheslav | Уговорил | [Ответить] |
| http://assembly.coe.int/ASP/APFeaturesManager/defaultArtSiteView.asp?ArtId=101
То же самое | ||
| Misha | Re: Уговорил | [Ответить] |
| Мне кажется, это заявление ОБСЕ на сайте ПАСЕ. | ||
| Сергей Федосов | Правильный перевод | [Ответить] |
| Неважно, счто сказала ПАСЕ, важно, кто переводил!
Вот как на самом деле было 23.11.2004 – The Chairman of the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, the President of the Parliamentary Assembly Peter Schieder and the Secretary General Terry Davis express their deep concern about the irregularities observed during the presidential elections in Ukraine. These irregularities have increased significantly in the second round as confirmed by numerous independent observers and increased considerably the risk of a serious political crisis in Ukraine because many Ukrainians do not accept the results announced by the Ukrainian Central Election Commission. The Council of Europe also expresses its appreciation of the maturity which Ukrainians have demonstrated during the first and second rounds of the presidential elections - a maturity confirmed by the high turnout. Ukrainian society has clearly proved its attachment to the principles of democracy. The Council of Europe appeals to all political forces in Ukraine to refrain from using force in this crisis situation. The Council of Europe also stresses that there is a need to observe the constitutional norms, to make, together with the OSCE, a common review of the elections and to announce the honest result of the elections. A failure to observe the principles of democracy will be met by clear opposition of the international public opinion and the majority of the Ukrainian society. This will engulf the country in a political and social crisis and will also distance Ukraine from the path towards European values and principles. А вот где это лежит - http://assembly.coe.int/ASP/Press/StopPressView.asp?CPID=1590 Там в конце ещё есть ссылочка для пытливых P.S. Михалычу можно туда не ходить, ему переводчики Вовочки всё КАК НАДО переведут :-)) | ||
| Сергей Федосов | Вопрос по украинским выборам | [Ответить] |
| Какая разница между "совсем не голосовать" и "проголосовать против всех"? | ||
| Ночной_Дозор | Re: Вопрос по украинским выборам [8] | [Ответить] |
| > Какая разница между "совсем не голосовать" и "проголосовать
> против всех"? Совсем - не приходить на голосование и твой голос уходит кому-то сам по себе. Против всех - так именно и проголосовать. Третья строка.? | ||
[ Список тем | Создать тему ]